Skip to main content

O Canada!

Today is International Women’s Day, which serves only to remind us that masculine rule is still considered the norm, otherwise why would we need one specific day? In fact, why do newspapers need to give us Women’s sections, or even Woman’s Hour? There’s no need for Man’s Hour. Even English law assumes the norm is sexed male and does not refer to us equally; in fact, England remains one of the last of the English speaking countries to bow to masculine rule when drafting legislation. Meg Munn, Minister for Women and Equality, calling for gender neutrality in legislative drafting on this day in 2007, said that ‘It may seem a small thing in one sense, but language is important. We have a society in which we believe men and women are equal, so why shouldn’t the law refer to us equally?’ Why shouldn’t everything refer to us equally? It is an issue Canada is aware of. Even Wales and Ireland have gone some way to addressing the issue. Ireland’s Oireachtas has endorsed gender neutrality for over a decade. But, unlike Canada, at least our national anthem reflects our Queen. However, that country’s PM, Stephen Harper, last week proposed to Parliament that its national anthem, ‘O Canada’, is made gender neutral. (http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/ceem-cced/symbl/anthem-eng.cfm). It is somewhat surprising this has been overlooked when one considers how Canada began drafting up Acts in non-sexist language around 1991. They have even let women join the Mounties since 1974, although I’m sure they wouldn’t allow their motto to become ‘The Mountie Always Gets Her Man’ Yet, judging by the reaction to Harper’s gender neutral proposal, anyone would think he had proposed mass castration. A poll conducted by torontosun.com reported 95% of the 2,582 respondents supported leaving the anthem as it is.


Why shouldn’t such a nation’s historical musical symbol remain the way it is? Partly because the current anthem was only made official in 1980 – hardly historical, although it was first recorded as being sung in 1901. There is also the point that the original 1908 poem upon which it was based, by Judge Robert Stanley Weir, was gender neutral! Yes, that’s right – gender neutral over a century ago, but a furore against reverting back to it in the twenty-first century! The particular line in the current anthem causing the most trouble is the line ‘True patriot love in all thy sons command’. Weir’s original version instead had ‘True patriot love thou dost in us command’. So, do they make one line gender neutral and thereby acknowledge half the population, or leave it as it is and remain true to the masculine rule? The full version of the Weir poem also includes ‘O Canada! Beneath thy shining skies/May stalwart sons and gentle maidens rise’. Allowing concessions for the essentialism of ‘gentle’ maidens and ‘stalwart’ sons, at least in 1908 there was still the theoretical possibility of maidens rising, even if there wasn’t the actual possibility. What Canada has, and will keep unless the proposed change is passed, is the actual possibility of maidens rising, but not the theoretical.
Yet, before you are swayed by those who shrug and ask ‘what does it matter’ it is worth remembering that they who own the language, own the power. Feminist scholar, Dale Spender, declared in 1985 that ‘there is sexism in language, it does enhance the position of males, and males have had control over the production of cultural forms.

Should ‘O Canada’ remain as it is? Is there a particular British national text that would particularly benefit from becoming gender neutral?

Popular posts from this blog

Who was Mary Burns?

On 7th January 1863 Mary Burns was found dead from a suspected heart attack. She was 43 years old. Since her death Mary has received barely any attention despite the fact that she spent over twenty years as the common-law wife of Friedrich Engels, one of the world’s most influential thinkers and the co-founder of Marxism.

Born in 1822, Mary was the oldest surviving child of textile dyer and factory operative, Michael Burns, and Mary Conroy, Irish immigrants from Tipperary. Mary’s parents had married at St. Patrick’s in an area known casually as Irish Town, one of few Catholic churches in Manchester at that time. The year of Mary’s birth and her infancy were significant in that Manchester was still dealing with the aftermath of the event that became known as the 1819 Peterloo Massacre, a peaceful protest of the working-classes on the site of St. Peter’s Fields in which several people were killed and hundreds injured. The Massacre occurred when magistrates, alarmed at the size of t…

Booker Shortlist announced

It's been a while... I know. Dog walking on the Downs, a bit of theatre, a bit of baking, a bit of writing etcetera etcetera. I also managed to read two complete books in the past month, which I was so pleased about. I had not read a whole book for about a year. The first was A Lie About My Father by Scottish poet/writer, John Burnside; a very well written memoir about father and son, but like all memoirs, some unreliability I felt. Poignant and tragic in equal measure. Then my husband returned from Cyprus (too hot for me this time of year, I can barely cope with England!) with Sebastian Faulks's Birdsong. He loved it. And then I read it and also loved it. I had originally picked it up several years ago but didn't get beyond Amiens, where the first section is set, but was really glad I did this time around. Another incredibly well written book in the style of a good Victorian! I felt a bit unsure about bits of Elizabeth, in the later section, but I have never learnt so muc…

Good Canary

Forgot to mention that we went to see Good Canary at Kingston's Rose Theatre last week. Star role played by the brilliantly intense Freya Mavor, who plays a speed addict. It's directed by John Malkovich - his UK's theatre directorial debut. Will try and post more about it later.