Skip to main content

Judas' Gift

The current (Christmas) issue of the London Review of Books features a one-page essay by writer and psychoanalyst (psychoanalyst writer?), Adam Phillips.

The last essay I read by Phillips, In Praise of Difficult Children, was - what other word can I use except 'brilliant'? From that can be unpacked: Insightful, thought-provoking, reassuring... Well it is the same of this current one, Judas' Gift. (There have been others in the LRB etween In Praise of ... and this one, which were also most of the above.) But perhaps there is a link between In Praise Of and Judas' Gift.

The latter lays out the elements of betrayal and then repositions them using the world's most famous traitor, Judas.

Phillips asks the reader to consider ourselves a betrayer; not just that, but to embrace it for what it could represent. It is Bob Dylan who is used to open this topic, though, and his betrayal of acoustic at Manchester's Free Trade Hall. Dylan had the audacity to greet his loyal followers with the electric guitar. When a fan shouted "Judas", Dylan 'responded by instructing his band to 'play fucking loud''.

Dylan's act of treachery, Phillips says, enabled his artistic growth. It was needed to service innovation. Many fans left that concert asking themselves WTF!? Yet Jesus didn't say the same of Judas - for Judas's act was needed in order to drive the plot line forward, bringing about Jesus's ultimate purpose.

Jesus knew who he could trust to betray him.

Yet it is a different betrayal from Dylan and his 'followers', who would be forced to reject their hero (why have heroes?), anf find a new one who would remain traditionally, well, traditional; safe. Or they would stick with Dylan - 'read' his music as the evolution of a musician they love(d).

Love demands so much - namely that of accepting change. Of both knowing - and waiting to feel - the need that our loved ones or those whom we've grown attached to - that others have to be true to themselves, which inevitably means betraying others. It also means recognising that we too will have to betray - that we will need to be true to ourselves in many different ways.

Phillips goes further. He asks just what was Judas doing in betraying Jesus. Why was he doing it? 'In betraying someone or something one is protecting someone or something else. And that someone or something else is of real value'.

For Dylan he was protecting his artistic growth ahead of the future monies and approval of his fans.

For Jesus and Judas Phillips asks what Judas had that gave him a priviledged position 'what did Judas have that the other disciples didn't that Jesus could use to transform himself'.

Dylan needed to lose or to obtain the disapproval of his fans in order to fully enter the new terrain. In sticking to the safety of a horde of followers who will accept only one type of music
(and with it - for many - the adherence to acoustic which represented a whole set of values) he was also removing himself - or attempting to - as their god.
There are many ways of reading it.
We all have our own instances. Yes, it's one of the most painful things. Betrayal by others is twinned with rage. And underneath that, ineffable sadness; insecurity; loss. Grief.

And yet life asks - of we are to live it fully and progressively - that we time and time again trust a few people. Who then, in many ways, let us down. And then we have to try and restore ourselves and repeat. And be prepared to betray others when it is absolutely necessary. Despite writing all this I don't fully understand - at a gut level - the impact that betrayal - my own and others - has had on my life and what the fear of confronting or executing more of it - 'really means'. I suppose it has a lot to do with the 'difficult child' within each of us - the one who wants to forge its own path yet still wants 'a way home'. Yet, as Phillips also includes, we have to be prepared to be in a place with 'no direction home'. It is also timely, at this time of ear, not because of Jesus and judas, but because of the 'call home' at this time of e year; of the duty to take up old roles; old dynamics. Perhaps next year - maybe even tomorrow - demands innovation; needs to stop using the old radar.

Location:Train from Manchester to Cardiff

Popular posts from this blog

Who was Mary Burns?

On 7th January 1863 Mary Burns was found dead from a suspected heart attack. She was 43 years old. Since her death Mary has received barely any attention despite the fact that she spent over twenty years as the common-law wife of Friedrich Engels, one of the world’s most influential thinkers and the co-founder of Marxism.

Born in 1822, Mary was the oldest surviving child of textile dyer and factory operative, Michael Burns, and Mary Conroy, Irish immigrants from Tipperary. Mary’s parents had married at St. Patrick’s in an area known casually as Irish Town, one of few Catholic churches in Manchester at that time. The year of Mary’s birth and her infancy were significant in that Manchester was still dealing with the aftermath of the event that became known as the 1819 Peterloo Massacre, a peaceful protest of the working-classes on the site of St. Peter’s Fields in which several people were killed and hundreds injured. The Massacre occurred when magistrates, alarmed at the size of t…

Booker Shortlist announced

It's been a while... I know. Dog walking on the Downs, a bit of theatre, a bit of baking, a bit of writing etcetera etcetera. I also managed to read two complete books in the past month, which I was so pleased about. I had not read a whole book for about a year. The first was A Lie About My Father by Scottish poet/writer, John Burnside; a very well written memoir about father and son, but like all memoirs, some unreliability I felt. Poignant and tragic in equal measure. Then my husband returned from Cyprus (too hot for me this time of year, I can barely cope with England!) with Sebastian Faulks's Birdsong. He loved it. And then I read it and also loved it. I had originally picked it up several years ago but didn't get beyond Amiens, where the first section is set, but was really glad I did this time around. Another incredibly well written book in the style of a good Victorian! I felt a bit unsure about bits of Elizabeth, in the later section, but I have never learnt so muc…

Days Without End and Mosul's Avengers

So fed up am I of buying books that I don't finish, that I decided I would go to the local library for a copy of Sebastian Barry's latest novel, Days Without End, which has just been awarded the Costa Prize. Unfortunately, I could only borrow it on the proviso that it was return by 1 February. I returned it the day after, without having finished it. I was about three quarters through, and will now have to go out and buy it for the final quarter. I loved Barry's The Secret Scripture, and on every publication of a new work, his star rises. Days Without End follows two boys, one descended from native Americans, and the other having arrived on one of the notorious coffin ships from famine struck Sligo. The tale is brave, funny, touching, but most of all Barry has achieved the perfect pitch. It is quite remarkable.

Another remarkable work comes in the form of reportage in the New Yorker (February 6, 2017) The Avengers of Mosul, by Luke Mogelson 'A Reporter at Large'.